I'm curious...why do you use a third party program to do partitioning?
Greg
Because it is a whole hell of a lot easier!
> The problem is that it extends into control panel, setup and config
> screens and I find that it makes things that I know how to do hard to
> figure out. I see no reason for these changes other then to attempt
> to make it easier for novices... and I don't think they have.
I think it has helped
At 10:54 PM 12/27/2008, you wrote:
Some comments in line...
I do find that with all of the high-color icons, it can occasionally be more
challenging to identify a particular icon when you're looking for it. Other
than that, I find the eye candy fairly appealing...it just adds a modern
flair to Wi
t;
> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:54:51
> To:
> Subject: Re: [H] XP64 verses Vista64
>
>
> Some comments in line...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
> > boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterl
odebase is tied to 64 bit server 2003. Uses same service packs, same
driver base, etc.
Sent via BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "Greg Sevart"
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:54:51
To:
Subject: Re: [H] XP64 verses Vista64
Some comments in line...
> -Original Messag
Some comments in line...
> -Original Message-
> From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
> boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 12:17 PM
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: [H] XP64 verses
After reading Brian's post last week, I thought I would give XP 64 a
try. I too have drivers for everything although I think it appears
that Vista 64 and XP64 share the same drivers.
XP 64 it has a foot print that is a third the size of Vista 64, it
handles my 8Gigs of RAM just fine, doesn't c
