Re: Power leakage: save 40mW by turning GSM on

2009-02-22 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:50:59AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: Given that power consumption was basicly the same 8,32 mW before and after the a...@poff command, what exactly is that command supposed to do? That's funny, though. No, it's not,

Re: Power leakage: save 40mW by turning GSM on

2009-02-22 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: But in the end, I realized that the modem powers up with deep sleep enabled, so after a few seconds of AT command inactivity, Right, the first thing you should do when working in non-mux mode is to %SLEEP=2. In

Re: Power leakage: save 40mW by turning GSM on

2009-02-22 Thread Joerg Reisenweber
Am So 22. Februar 2009 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: But in the end, I realized that the modem powers up with deep sleep enabled, so after a few seconds of AT command inactivity, Right, the first thing you

Re: Power leakage: save 40mW by turning GSM on

2009-02-22 Thread Werner Almesberger
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: For lack of a brown paper hat, I'm wearing the box that my Neo shipped in. Heh ;-) Thanks for the update. One GSM mystery down :) In particular, is it supposed to undo the effects of AT+CFUN=1 (which will turn on receiver, transmitter and everything else