Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> So *no* "new GPIO routing" ;-).
Okay, I just saw two GPIOs connected to components handling power,
amidst a flurry of other changes, and felt my neck hair rise.
> And of course I considered reverse-feeding:
Alright, you rule ;-)
Cheers, Werner
__
Am Do 21. August 2008 schrieb Joerg Reisenweber:
> This rail is 0V as long as there's no USB-supply voltage. We are fine for
> all cases except shutdown when on charger.
Actually the problem case is "shutdown, hooked to charger, AND overvoltage
detected". Then we still got 100kR on this line
/
Am Mi 20. August 2008 schrieb Werner Almesberger:
> Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> > Fine! But where in this description is the point about ME suggesting sth
> > like routing (new) GPIO to all sorts of peripherals???
>
> Ah, this was the mail that scared me:
> https://lists.internal.openmoko.org/pipe
> There are people that think all kinds of stupid stuff, we shouldn't
> let
> it divert us from reality.
> - -Andy
If I'd read it on a wet t-shirt, I'd believe it, but as it stands,
just some dork email .. meh. I want to BELIEVE!
;
--
Jay Vaughan
__
Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Fine! But where in this description is the point about ME suggesting sth
> like routing (new) GPIO to all sorts of peripherals???
Ah, this was the mail that scared me:
https://lists.internal.openmoko.org/pipermail/gta03/2008-August/000497.html
> I'm well aware about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Am Mi 20. August 2008 schrieb Werner Almesberger:
|> Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
|>> HUH? Please give a pointer or quote! :-(
|> Phew. Instead of spending the rest of the day searching through our
|> archives
Am Mi 20. August 2008 schrieb Werner Almesberger:
> Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> > HUH? Please give a pointer or quote! :-(
>
> Phew. Instead of spending the rest of the day searching through our
> archives for those old problems, let me just briefly describe what
> happened:
Fine! But where in th
Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> HUH? Please give a pointer or quote! :-(
Phew. Instead of spending the rest of the day searching through our
archives for those old problems, let me just briefly describe what
happened:
- GTA01: while powering down (PMU.NoPower), the GPIOs would "jerk",
causing MODEM_
> > If I'm in a situation where I absolutely want to make sure we don't
> > emit any power, I'd remove the battery anyway.
> OK, there are people who feel uncomfortable with a battery in *any*
cellphone
> nearby, when they have some confidential talk ;-)
OTOH, I'm more concerned about possible t
Am Mi 20. August 2008 schrieb Werner Almesberger:
> I don't have any specific problem I suspect to happen. I just wanted
> to point out the general problem (which seems particularly bad with
> those Samsung SoCs), which seems to be important since Joerg recently
> suggested to run all sorts of GPI
Andy Green wrote:
> Have a look at the circuit and give some examples of signals that can be
> in this condition in "off" state, then we can talk about it. Otherwise
> it's just handwaving.
I don't have any specific problem I suspect to happen. I just wanted
to point out the general problem (whic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| So unless we're absolutely sure no GPIO can ever have a non-zero
| potential (or only through a very large impedance) while we're in
Have a look at the circuit and give some examples of signals that can be
12 matches
Mail list logo
