On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:50:59AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
Given that power consumption was basicly the same 8,32 mW before and
after
the a...@poff command, what exactly is that command supposed to do?
That's funny, though.
No, it's not,
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Rask Ingemann
Lambertsen:
But in the end, I realized that the modem powers
up with deep sleep enabled, so after a few seconds of AT command
inactivity,
Right, the first thing you should do when working in non-mux mode is to
%SLEEP=2.
In
Am So 22. Februar 2009 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer:
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Rask Ingemann
Lambertsen:
But in the end, I realized that the modem powers
up with deep sleep enabled, so after a few seconds of AT command
inactivity,
Right, the first thing you
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
For lack of a brown paper hat, I'm wearing the box that my Neo shipped
in.
Heh ;-) Thanks for the update. One GSM mystery down :)
In particular, is it supposed to undo the effects of AT+CFUN=1 (which
will turn on receiver, transmitter and everything else
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:09:06PM -0200, Werner Almesberger wrote:
[...]
I found one more funny today: activating GSM saves about 40mW.
[...]
Did you get any further with this?
Anyway, I'm now running the andy-tracking kernel, but still no dice.
After a reboot (using NOR u-boot), I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Hi Werner,
|
| I just wanted to congratulate you on your work. As we both know, those
| detailed current measurements should have been done years ago. Good to
| see they finally get done.
I do not think
6 matches
Mail list logo
