Re: [HarfBuzz] are there any recent changes in harfbuzz?

2010-08-23 Thread Lars Knoll
On 20 August 2010 20:10, Lars Knoll lars.kn...@nokia.commailto:lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: if on both then whats are exactly plan? I can only speak for Qt here: We are currently using harfbuzz. Once ng is ready, we'll evaluate and see how to move over. This will certainly not happen

[HarfBuzz] Should MarkToBase attachment zero the mark advance?

2010-08-23 Thread Jonathan Kew
Hi Behdad, I notice that the code in MarkArray::apply() includes the following: hb_internal_glyph_position_t o = c-buffer-pos[c-buffer-i]; o.x_advance = 0; o.y_advance = 0; o.x_offset = base_x - mark_x; o.y_offset = base_y - mark_y; o.back = c-buffer-i - glyph_pos;

Re: [HarfBuzz] Should MarkToBase attachment zero the mark advance?

2010-08-23 Thread Denis Jacquerye
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jonathan Kew jonat...@jfkew.plus.com wrote: Hi Behdad, I notice that the code in MarkArray::apply() includes the following:    hb_internal_glyph_position_t o = c-buffer-pos[c-buffer-i];    o.x_advance = 0;    o.y_advance = 0;    o.x_offset  = base_x -