Thanks, Keith, for your very informative email!
I myself am quite tempted to just use a bunch of ligatures for glyph
reordering -- at least in this first round of the implementation. It
seems easy enough, and I can get very precise positioning of the
reference glyphs through a visual interface
In article aanlkti=gcb=m0snal8w=uc=nyxzzfj225hvghhvkh...@mail.gmail.com, Ed
ed.tra...@gmail.com writes:
I think what I would like to do, ideally, is create a pure version
of the font that uses only proper OpenType features. Then after that,
I could add certain corruptions like negative left
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Jonathan Kew jonat...@jfkew.plus.com wrote:
On 16 Sep 2010, at 02:33, Ed wrote:
Hi, Behdad and everyone,
Just want to confirm something:
I thought Harfbuzz-ng did not yet have complex text shaper support.
But in Firefox 4 beta with
Since my primary goal is to test a Tai Tham font that I am attempting
to create which incorporates aforementioned OpenType features, I
wonder what is the best way to test it?
No. Firefox is using harfbuzz only for certain simple scripts such as
Latin; it
falls back to platform code (CoreText
On 16 Sep 2010, at 15:29, Ed wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Jonathan Kew jonat...@jfkew.plus.com wrote:
On 16 Sep 2010, at 02:33, Ed wrote:
Hi, Behdad and everyone,
Just want to confirm something:
I thought Harfbuzz-ng did not yet have complex text shaper support.
But in
Thanks for the very useful information, Jonathan!
What I am seeing so far (for Tai Tham) is that I can get GSUB ccmp
with dflt ligature substitutions to work on both FF-3.6x,
FF-4x-linux, and FF-4x-osx. But GPOS mark with dflt mark-to-base
don't work on any of these.
The only way I can get
On 16 Sep 2010, at 22:43, Ed wrote:
Thanks for the very useful information, Jonathan!
What I am seeing so far (for Tai Tham) is that I can get GSUB ccmp
with dflt ligature substitutions to work on both FF-3.6x,
FF-4x-linux, and FF-4x-osx.
This suggests that pango (on Linux) and CoreText
