Hi Daniel,
I don't think that there is any special reason for the absence of the
classes you mention; the package looks to be incomplete because of lack
of time. So far as I am aware there is no one actively working in this
area so any contributions you could make would be a terrific help to
*really* need it.
Best regards,
George
2006/7/20, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
George,
I remember my past experience with BeanShell - I was trying to create
the custom BeanShell task for ant 1.6.1. I can't say I haven't
succeeded. But I remember
Richard Liang wrote:
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
The more I work with our tests the more I see that managing tests via
directory layout is worse than using metadata.
Agree :-)
I thought about three more characteristics we might want to mark-up
tests
with:
- Platform-specific unit tests
-
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-948 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order
to simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included
and excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need
Best regards,
George
2006/7/19, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Alexei,
I just downloaded the latest working build of TestNG 5.0 [1] and support
for the jvm attribute is in there. This is not the official release
build.
Best regards,
George
[1] http://testng.org/testng-5.0.zip
Alexei
. When I get a chance I will try and
explore your idea further.
I really appreciate your input here.
Best regards,
George
2006/7/20, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
If annotations were
Hi,
Since the cacerts file contains root certificate information from
well-known CA outfits that in at least one case is already publicly
available I would hope that there is less of a legal problem than we
think. For instance, take a look at the Verisign root certificates
repository [1]
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'm integrating HARMONY-536, the JSSE provider. Two things:
1) it's contributed to go into x-net, but the package namespace is
o.a.h.security.provider.jsse
so I wonder if this would be better off in the security
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order
to simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included
and excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need to be
agreed by the project. Consider
? Thanks a lot.
[1]http://testng.org/doc/ant.html
Best regards,
Richard
George Harley wrote:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/18/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
SNIP!
Here the annotation on MyTestClass applies to all of its test
methods.
So what
] Total tests run: 179, Failures: 10, Skips: 0
[testng-14] ===
...
Exactly the same results as with Sun JDK 1.4.
Note: you may need to hatch the build.xml a little bit to achieve this.
Thanks,
2006/7/19, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Richard
Hi,
Agreed. I think that the file is used in a couple of luni tests for
java.lang.ClassLoader. No significance in the fact that it is a .c file
and, as far as I can see, no special reason why it needs to be in the
support folder.
Best regards,
George
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 19 July 2006
in case of VM hang or crash. I
suggest this only as a temporary solution. BTW, the fact that TestNG
ant task still doesn't have such attributes looks like a sign for me -
TestNG can be still immature in some aspects. Still comparing TestNG
and JUnit.
Regards,
2006/7/19, George Harley [EMAIL
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
SNIP!
Here the annotation on MyTestClass applies to all of its test methods.
So what are the well-known TestNG groups that we could define for use
inside Harmony ? Here are some of my initial thoughts:
* type.impl -- tests that are specific
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
SNIP!
Here the annotation on MyTestClass applies to all of its test methods.
So what are the well-known TestNG groups that we could define for
use inside Harmony ? Here are some of my initial thoughts
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/18/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
SNIP!
Here the annotation on MyTestClass applies to all of its test
methods.
So what are the well-known TestNG groups that we could define for use
inside Harmony ? Here
that if you intend to use the TestNG annotations
approach then you will need to wait for a 5.0 VM for Harmony.
Best regards,
George
Thanks,
2006/7/18, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/18/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
SNIP
are dependent on a 5.0 VM being available to run Harmony on. Hopefully
that will materialise sometime soon.
Best regards,
George
2006/7/18, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/18/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
George Harley wrote:
SNIP!
Here
This is fantastic news. Congratulations Paulex.
Best regards,
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Paulex Yang.
Mark has demonstrated the elements that help build a healthy community,
namely his ability to work
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/14/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order to
simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included and
excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need to be agreed
,
George
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
Just seen Tim's note on test support classes and it really caught my
attention as I have been mulling over this issue for a little while
now. I think that it is a good time for us to return to the topic of
class library test layouts.
The current proposal [1
. Your alternative version of the test looks
great to me.
Best regards,
George
2006/7/13, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
George Harley wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
You are probably already aware of this but the tests that use the
SerClassLoader custom class loader result
Hi Mikhail,
Just seen your note. Yes, of course, I will look at this immediately.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best regards,
George
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George!
HARMONY-88 contribution contains a file MockJavaBean2.bin
that seems to be a binary representation of
Hi,
I looked at this earlier on (soon after my first note) and found that
the matter seemed to already been resolved ?
Best regards,
George
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George!
HARMONY-88 contribution contains a file MockJavaBean2.bin
that seems to be a binary representation of
Hi Mikhail,
You are probably already aware of this but the tests that use the
SerClassLoader custom class loader result in a StackOverflowError when
run against the RI. The overridden implementation of
findResource(String) calls getResource(String) which, according to the
spec, may end up
://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#annotations
3. http://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#test-groups
4. http://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#rerunning
Best regards,
Richard.
-Nathan
-Original Message-
From: George Harley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi,
If there are really useful tests that are being unnecessarily excluded
by being in the same *Test class, then you may want to consider moving
the failing tests into SecureRandom3Test and excluding that -- but by
the sound of it all SecureRandom tests will be failing.
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Actually, there's a very valid benefit for using TestNG markers (=
annotations/JavaDoc) for grouping tests; the directory structure is a
tree, whereas the markers can form any slice of tests, and the sets
Concerning TestNG vs JUnit. I just like to pay your attention on
+1
--
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-609 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a)
-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200607.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/7/10, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Actually, there's a very valid benefit for using TestNG markers (=
annotations/JavaDoc) for grouping tests; the directory structure is a
tree, whereas
Tim Ellison wrote:
May I tactfully suggest that we get this back to a discussion of the
pros and cons of JUnit test suites and/or TestNG metadata vs. directory
layout.
It sounds like we all want to resolve that problem asap.
Regards,
Tim
+1
--
George
George Harley wrote:
Mark
Alex Blewitt wrote:
On 06/07/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that you're very familiar with TestNG. ;-) So would you please
identify what we shall do to transfer from junit to TestNG? Thanks a
lot.
Me? I'm just highly opinionated :-)
Hi Alex,
I think we are all
Hi Mark,
From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from
pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one patch
(HARMONY-755). It would be great if you or Paulex (and everyone in fact)
could comment in the [classlib] Testing conventions - a proposal
thread
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mark,
From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart
from pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one
patch (HARMONY-755).
Well, obviously that wasn't my
that we can get on with more valuable activities.
Best regards,
George
George Harley wrote:
Hi Mark,
From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from
pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one patch
(HARMONY-755). It would be great if you or Paulex
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 6 July 2006 at 18:05, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mark,
From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart
from pushing code around
Hi,
Just seen Tim's note on test support classes and it really caught my
attention as I have been mulling over this issue for a little while now.
I think that it is a good time for us to return to the topic of class
library test layouts.
The current proposal [1] sets out to segment our
Congratulations !
--
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Weldon Washburn.
Weldon was one of the initial committers listed on the original Harmony
proposal. Incubator tradition is such that listed committers be
Hi,
The test fails on Linux appear to have been caused by HARMONY-755 which
I committed a little earlier today. I have backed out the changes and
will re-open the JIRA now. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
Best regards,
George
Apache Harmony Build wrote:
Online report :
Hi,
Just noticed that the source file java.util.regex.AbstractCharClass in
modules/regex contains the following Javadoc comment for the
PredefinedCharacterClasses inner class:
/**
* character classes generated from
* http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/
*
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][regex] Acknowledgement of Unicode Character
Database
+1
That's fine. Go for it.
geir
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
Just noticed that the source file java.util.regex.AbstractCharClass in
modules/regex contains the following Javadoc comment
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Occasionally I use make/build-tests.xml to access the 'gen-reports' target.
I only do this when I run a test from within a single module, instead of a
full test run. Maybe there is a better or easier way.
-Nathan
Hi Nathan,
Maybe this isn't exactly what you mean, but
Sorry Tim,
I committed 704 just before your note got downloaded to my email client.
Best regards,
George
Tim Ellison wrote:
Please hold-off any commits to classlib code for about an hour, so we
can get a stable snapshot.
There are two issues that are currently under investigation:
- this
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
For the example I've started this thread with it seems that complying
the spec is
more appropriate there. But probably there are other examples that
caused that the doc was worded the given way
George and Tim could you please comment?
Thanks,
Mikhail
Hi Mikhail,
I love
: Re: [classlib][testing] excluding the failed tests
George Harley wrote:
Hi Geir,
As you may recall, a while back I floated the idea and supplied some
seed code to define all known test failing test methods in an XML file
(an exclusions list) that could be used by JUnit at test run time
Hi Tim,
Fixed by your revision 417397 change. Looks like I just chose a bad time
to update from the repository.
Thanks,
George
George Harley wrote:
Hi Tim,
I have started to see test errors in my local Windows XP sandbox since
this commit. In particular there are three tests in the new
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Yeah, I noticed that. Unfortunately, it can only be used luni for now, since
the compiler is turning it into an interface class. The sooner we move to
1.5 class files the better; I'm tired of the weird 1.5 source to 1.4 class
file behavior that's basically undefined.
Hi
Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: George Harley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Yeah, I noticed that. Unfortunately, it can only be used luni for now,
since
the compiler is turning it into an interface class. The sooner we move
Hi Stepan,
Just seen your note. This is a bit odd; seems that different tests are
failing depending on the Linux distro. As has been pointed out, on
Debian and Red Hat EL4 it is a question of variability with the
InetAddress host name whereas you are seeing an unexpected number of
aliases
Hi Nathan,
Yes, seeing this too. Suspect that the Swing and AWT manifests are
currently broken and that this is upsetting PDE. Perhaps things can be
temporarily solved for you by reverting your Eclipse PDE target to a
build prior to the Swing/AWT ? Assuming you have one lying around.
Best
Hi Paulex,
Sorry about that. Requested change made in revision 415600.
Best regards,
George
Paulex Yang wrote:
George,
nio project cannot compile in my Eclipse after this revision, seems
the MANIFEST.MF needs to add tests.util to Import-Package section as
below, would you please have a
r415629).
Regards,
Tim
George Harley wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Yes, seeing this too. Suspect that the Swing and AWT manifests are
currently broken and that this is upsetting PDE. Perhaps things can be
temporarily solved for you by reverting your Eclipse PDE target to a
build prior to the Swing/AWT
Hello Vladimir,
The agreements page on the web site [1] is also of interest here
although it does not dive into any details beyond asking that all
resource files go under module root/src/test/resources.
Seeing as you are canvassing for opinions then my shiny 2 Euro cents
worth is that:
*
Belated congratulations Mark !
--
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Mark Hindess.
Mark has demonstrated the elements that help build a healthy community,
namely his ability to work together with others, continued
Congratulations Nathan !
--
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nathan Beyer.
Nathan has shown sustained dedication to the project, an ability to work
well with others, and share the common vision we have for
demonstrates the possible way. Also are we going to create negative
tests,
for example, for broken server response? I think yes. Can jetty server be
used for negative testing?
Yes. You can send back any error.
See other comments below
On 5/22/06, George Harley wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote
-164
demonstrates the possible way. Also are we going to create negative
tests,
for example, for broken server response? I think yes. Can jetty
server be
used for negative testing?
See other comments below
On 5/22/06, George Harley wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 5/19/06, Tim Ellison wrote
objects this can be done with no problems and HARMONY-164
demonstrates the possible way. Also are we going to create negative
tests,
for example, for broken server response? I think yes. Can jetty
server
be
used for negative testing?
See other comments below
On 5/22/06, George
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/23, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the following
4 bytes:
0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
?
Have you checked ?
I'm just asking. I do not state that
Hi Mikhail,
I misunderstood your
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George,
On 5/19/06, George Harley wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
[SNIP]
Hi Stepan,
Is your preference to separate out all remote server dependent tests
(that could be made work with a locally installed server) from the
normal test flow ?
Yes.
For instance, have
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 5/19/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
snip
I'm OK only if we separate tests with Jetty from common test suite
run.
Why?
Because each external dependency complicates 'normal' test suite run ( I
don't want to face with situation when to run Harmony
Hi Miguel,
A list of files that you think can be removed would be ideal. Maybe add
it as a comment to the JIRA ?
Thank you,
George
Miguel Montes wrote:
George:
Ok. Would you like me to send a pruned version, or a list of files to be
removed?
Miguel
On 5/18/06, George Harley [EMAIL
Hi Stepan,
Yes, there is probably scope for adding some logic to this test method
where - in the event of no network connection we write a message to
stderr and move on. An alternative is to provide for connections to be
opened up against a server on the local machine. A couple of days ago I
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/19, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Stepan,
Yes, there is probably scope for adding some logic to this test method
where - in the event of no network connection we write a message to
stderr and move on. An alternative is to provide for connections to be
opened up
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George,
see below
On 5/19/06, George Harley wrote:
Hi Stepan,
Yes, there is probably scope for adding some logic to this test method
where - in the event of no network connection we write a message to
stderr and move on. An alternative is to provide for connections
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello Paulex
I have a question about this problem. Do you know how exception in
finalizer
method affects the finalizer thread that it becomes suspended? I thought
that when calling finalize method the code should catch all exceptions
thrown by it and ignore them.
intended to
be loaded by boot class loader, compiled to bin.injected
Does that sound reasonable ?
Best regards,
George
2006/5/17, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George, see below
2006/5/16
differentiating mark to a class or
package name.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/18, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George,
I use ant to build and run the tests, so I'm likely unaware of some
Eclipse
problems.
If we put classpath test classes to
impl/java and api/java
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
There are classes like X509CertImpl.java in this case impl test for it
would be X509CertImplImplTest which does not look very good.
How about ITest ?
Thanks,
Mikhail
Hi Mikhail,
Sure, that works for me.
Best regards,
George
2006/5/18, George Harley [EMAIL
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George, see below
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mikhail,
I have a couple of minor comments about your proposal for a test
layouts. I should have responded sooner, I know, but I
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George, see below
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mikhail,
I have a couple of minor comments about your proposal for a test
layouts. I should have responded sooner, I know, but I have suffered
from a number of hardware problems in the past few weeks
Mark Hindess wrote:
This has broken because the subant target picks up any directory
matching modules/* which has a make/build.xml in it. The modules/rmi2/
make/build.xml isn't integrated so it breaks the build.
Quick fix would be to rename:
modules/rmi2/make/build.xml
to:
Hi Geir,
I'll take it.
Best regards,
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
10 +1 votes, no others.
Someone want to re-assign to themselves and bring this in?
Please make sure that the initial commit is *identical* to what was
contributed, and then do any tweaks, fixes, moves etc from there.
Hi Geir,
I'll take it.
Best regards,
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
9 +1 votes, no others.
Someone want to re-assign to themselves and bring this in?
Please make sure that the initial commit is *identical* to what was
contributed, and then do any tweaks, fixes, moves etc from there.
Hi Mikhail,
I have a couple of minor comments about your proposal for a test
layouts. I should have responded sooner, I know, but I have suffered
from a number of hardware problems in the past few weeks that slowed
things down somewhat for me. Anyway, it's all great but it would be nice
to
.
On 5/11/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
I would like to start a little discussion around JIRA issue 436 [1]
which deals with exception throwing compatibility between Harmony
and
the RI. I feel it is important
Chris Gray wrote:
On Friday 12 May 2006 11:37, George Harley wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Note, the RI is NOT throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions, it is just
letting them happen via invalid array look ups, but in these cases, the
specification is marked
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds like there are as many interpretations of the guidelines as
their are correspondents on this topic :-)
My suggested change would be that we state that Harmony class library
code should throw exceptions of the same
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-211 in paper form and
have reviewed them, so I can assert that the critical provenance
paperwork is in order. It is not in SVN yet, but I wanted to get this
vote going at the same time as the Intel
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-256, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
This is the contribution from Intel.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class
Hi,
Just a heads up to you all (and especially anyone working in beans just
now) that I would like to make some changes to src/tests in the beans
module in the next day or so. Proposed changes are similar to the tidy
ups that have taken place in archive, jndi, rmi, logging, prefs etc over
Hi,
I would like to start a little discussion around JIRA issue 436 [1]
which deals with exception throwing compatibility between Harmony and
the RI. I feel it is important to reach a concrete agreement on this as
so far all of the participants in the issue seem to disagree about the
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Of course, the text module has only implementation-independent
tests that designed to be run from classpath. For modules that have
got implementation-specific tests then I suppose we could use
something like
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Of course, the text module has only implementation-independent
tests that designed to be run from classpath. For modules that
have got implementation-specific tests
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Of course, the text module has only implementation-independent
tests that designed to be run from classpath. For modules that
have got
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
We have all the docs for HARMONY-114 and they are in SVN
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run 3 days unless a) someone states they
org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.impl.[package under test] or
org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.internal.[package under test] etc.
I've got no preference.
Best regards,
George
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/pkgnaming.html
2006/3/24, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 26 April 2006 at 14:50, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
Update 396968 renamed tests in 'text' module. Could you provide a new
patch for this module?
It should just be:
sed
output=bin/resources/test kind=src
path=src/test/resources/
classpathentry output=bin/resources/main kind=src
path=src/main/resources/
George Harley (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-349?page=all ]
George Harley resolved HARMONY-349
Hi Stepan,
As I recall it ( I've not my morning coffee yet so it could get a bit
unreliable here :-) ) the motivation for wanting resource files on the
classpath was to enable serialization data files to be read in by test
programs without depending on specific file locations. Copying such
Paulex Yang wrote:
Stepan
+1.
I just proposed similar modification to classpath of each modules in
another thread, which will make the IDE(Eclipse at least) user easier
to run test.
Hi Paulex,
Your proposed modification to the Eclipse .classpath file doesn't add
src/test/resources to the
Mark Hindess wrote:
I suspect inclusion of the resource files (with path renaming) could
be handled by a zip/tar task rather than by copying every time the
tests are run. So I don't think this is a good reason.
Regards,
Mark.
Hi Mark,
The resource files don't get copied every time the
Hi Mark,
Sorry, I misunderstood your append. Please ignore my response. I really
need to go for a coffee :-)
Best regards,
George
George Harley wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
I suspect inclusion of the resource files (with path renaming) could
be handled by a zip/tar task rather than
environment is Eclipse 3.2 M5 on WinXP
If this issue can be resolved, I'm fine to output them directly to
existing bin/test directory.
George Harley wrote:
Hi Paulex,
Adding new Eclipse source folders to a module to cater for the
resources sounds good to me, but I don't understand the need to have
regards,
George
George Harley wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
Well, George, you caught me;)
I tried your solution on TEXT module at first, but for some unknown
reasons, Eclipse refused to compile according to the modification and
outputs:
Cannot nest output folder 'text/bin/main' inside output folder
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/20/06, George Harley wrote:
Hi Stepan,
As I recall it ( I've not my morning coffee yet so it could get a bit
unreliable here :-) ) the motivation for wanting resource files on the
classpath was to enable serialization data files to be read in by test
programs
Paulex Yang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi Paulex,
I pressed send a bit too soon there. This is the sort of classpath
set up I was referring to in the previous message. Please note the
bottom classpathentry element which I think specifies the default
output folder for a project
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
