RE: [classlib] exception messages

2006-05-12 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:50 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] exception messages Mikhail Loenko wrote: 2006/5/12, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tests shouldn't assert the actual message String in an exception. I

RE: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-256 : Contribution of DNS service provider for JNDI classlibrary code

2006-05-08 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
+1 Thanks, Mikhail -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:29 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-256 : Contribution of DNS service provider for JNDI classlibrary code I have received

RE: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-337 : Contribution of RMI framework

2006-05-08 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
+1 Thanks, Mikhail -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:46 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-337 : Contribution of RMI framework I have received the ACQs and the BCC for

RE: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-199 : Contribution of javax.crypto and java.math

2006-05-08 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
+1 Thanks, Mikhail -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:05 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-199 : Contribution of javax.crypto and java.math I have received the ACQs and the BCC

RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-404) Wild card exclusions are excluding working tests

2006-04-27 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
Wow! I've broken the build! Thanks, Mikhail -Original Message- From: Mark Hindess (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 5:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-404) Wild card exclusions are excluding working tests [

RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-237) PropertyDescriptor constructors throws incorrect (or no) exception

2006-04-21 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
Mark, This is the test from the second patch, it is not quite clear which test from the first patch do you mean. Am I missing something? = Author: mloenko Date: Thu Apr 20 23:23:20 2006 New Revision: 395794 URL:

RE: [jira] Assigned: (HARMONY-376) [classlib][luni] Generics uplift for java.lang.String and java.util.Comparator

2006-04-19 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
Hi Nathan the patch breaks the build compile: [javac] Compiling 1639 source files to C:\harmony\build [javac] C:\harmony\modules\jndi\src\main\java\javax\naming\CompositeName.java:50 9: compareTo(java.lang.String) in java.lang.String cannot be applied to (java.lang.Object) [javac]

RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-350) HARMONY-39 Regular expressions does not match backreferences during find.

2006-04-18 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
Nikolay, please provide a single patch that resolves the problem Thanks, Mikhail -Original Message- From: Nikolay Kuznetsov (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-350) HARMONY-39 Regular

RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16

2006-01-15 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
measurement code. Sound reasonable ? Best regards, George George C. Harley Loenko, Mikhail Y [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/01/2006 12:12 Please respond to harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org To harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org cc Subject RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16

RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16

2006-01-13 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
As far as we did not have special performance tests, we used unit tests to measure performance, i.e. to compare performance of our classes to performance of standard classes. So we ran in cycle a single unit test on both when there are our security classes in bootclasspath and when there are not.

RE: Writing JavaDoc

2006-01-12 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
may recall the brouhaha over JDocs a while ago (if not, google for 'Rick Ross JDocs' to get a flavour) Regards, Tim Loenko, Mikhail Y wrote: Agreed with #1 Let me better explain #3. It is not a taglet copying Sun's spec. Instead it should insert pointers to specification of actual methods

RE: [RESULT] ( Was Re: [VOTE] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-16 (Intel's contrib of security code for classlib))

2006-01-10 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
Thanks for accepting the contribution There's a bit of things that come out of this, like the com.intel.drl.spec_ref javadoc tag that we should convert, and such. What would be the best for those javadocs? We can have 3 possible options: 1. Copy-paste from the spec. Not sure it is legal 2.

RE: Writing JavaDoc

2006-01-10 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-16 (Intel's contrib of security code for classlib))) Loenko, Mikhail Y wrote: Thanks for accepting the contribution There's a bit of things that come out of this, like the com.intel.drl.spec_ref javadoc tag that we should convert, and such. What would

RE: Contribution of security, crypto, and x-net libraries

2005-11-21 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
as a big freight train and [an earlier] contribution builds on the contributions of Dan, Archie, David, and all the others and the train is starting to move. The nice thing about a lot of mass is that even small velocities result in very large momentum. Loenko, Mikhail Y wrote: With pleasure I

Contribution of security, crypto, and x-net libraries

2005-11-18 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
With pleasure I announce the first contribution to Harmony on behalf of Intel. The archive with the contribution is uploaded to the following location: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-16 The contribution includes the following things related to Java security: 1) Java Security