David is of course correct in noting the 'bare bones' wprding of the
ALA resolution on Dina Carter's death. The next line after the one he
quoted is no better: ALA condemns the violence that resulted in the
loss of Dina Carter's life - as he said there is no indication as to
who was
Yes, I noticed that, too.
I long ago stopped trusting ALA.
Madeleine
Madeleine Cohen Oakley
Director of Library Services
Adas Israel Congregation
Washington, DC
---
Messages and opinions expressed on Hasafran are those of the individual author
and are not necessarily endorsed by the
The ALA Memorial Resolution Honoring Dina Carter was not very
strong stating Dina Carter was killed in the bombing at the Mt.
Scopus campus of Hebrew University on July 31, 2000. No
condemnation of the Palestinian terrorists who were responsible for
the bombing. If you read the ALA
I think the more even-handed treatment by ALA in this case may be a
result of the flak they encountered after their last Israel
resolution. It makes a good argument to standing up when these things
happen: you might not change the outcome of the current outrage but
you might affect what
and other cultural institutions from the recent Gaza conflict
X-Original-To: Hasafran@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
X-Spam-Score: 1.30 (*) [Tag at 5.00] MISSING_SUBJECT
X-CanItPRO-Stream: lists
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
5 matches
Mail list logo
