>My interpretation of the last set of mailings on the issue was that people
>had given up. Obviously that was incorrect.
We never give up!-) Well, almost never.
It was a frustrating experience, and I spend a lot of time debugging
perfectly correct programs, searching for documentation, and wai
At 09:13 +0300 1998/11/16, S.D.Mechveliani wrote:
>> In the Prelude
>> ~~~
>>
>> class Functor f where
>> fmap :: (a -> b) -> f a -> f b
>
>
>What about renaming it, say, to Mappable f ?
>
>It looks like the word `functor' is taken from the very category
>t
On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Claus Reinke wrote:
> >My interpretation of the last set of mailings on the issue was that people
> >had given up. Obviously that was incorrect.
>
> We never give up!-) Well, almost never.
:-)
> Finally, I had to put the problem aside and wait for the environment
> (JDK i
Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> We're nearly done with Haskell 98.
> ...
> In the Prelude
> ~~~
>
> class Functor f where
> fmap :: (a -> b) -> f a -> f b
What about renaming it, say, to Mappable f ?
It looks like the word `functor'
