Dear ghc experts,
I need an advice on -O, INLINE, NOINLINE usage for ghc-4.01 and
highers.
My program contains many short definitions, like, say,
bound = 2^20 :: Integer
lc :: C a = Pol a - a
lc (Pol ms _) = fst (head ms)
- also many of them are the class operation
I have discovered a bug in the handling of hi files in the
presence of
-fglasgow-exts. Below is a module, MyModule.hs, which uses
Word internally
but exports a function of type Integer-Integer. There is
also a Main.hs
module which uses this function, but of course does not
import
I have discovered a bug in the handling of hi files in the presence of
-fglasgow-exts. Below is a module, MyModule.hs, which uses Word internally
but exports a function of type Integer-Integer. There is also a Main.hs
module which uses this function, but of course does not import Word since
A while ago, I read that GHC is supposed to work with egcs.
However, GHC 3.02 doesn't work for me with egcs 1.1b. The
latter complaint about illegally spilled registers when
compiling some module with -fglasgow-exts, and an attempt to
compile 4.01 from source produced a compiler that couldn't
Hi,I found the following errors when I tried to compile the stuff generated
by de ihc:
bash$ make
../../ihc -fno-export-list -fcom -fcoalesce-methods
-ftreat-importlibs-as-import
s -foleview-input -fno-gen-binary-interface -fenum-instances
-fno-gen-enum-marsh
allers -i../../imports Cmax101.idl
Using 4.01, outa the box, with -fglasgow-exts.
I get the following complaint:
Main.hs:25:
No instance for `Probe (Trans DLX_Op (DLX_Cell DLXReg Int))'
arising from use of `processor' at Main.hs:25
Now, scanning the relevant .hi files, I have:
instance __forall [_a]
I need an advice on -O, INLINE, NOINLINE usage for ghc-4.01 and
highers.
My program contains many short definitions, like, say,
bound = 2^20 :: Integer
lc :: C a = Pol a - a
lc (Pol ms _) = fst (head ms)
- also many of them are the class operation definitions.
I thank Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the help on my
request
I need an advice on -O, INLINE, NOINLINE usage for ghc-4.01 ...
AlsoAnd it looks like ghc-4.01 -c -O ignores NOINLINE.
occured my mistake. I am sorry. I compiled by ghc -c -O
f = 'b'
prefixed with {-# NOINLINE f
Dear Haskell user,
A group of Haskell supporters is trying to raise money to support the
further development and maintenance of the Hugs interpreter and its
integration with the GHC run-time system. The idea is not to ask for
money to do research, or to add zillions of new features and
