As a quick follow up, I should have said. The same program
runs fine with
ghc-4.02 under linux.
That's bizarre, because there's no architecture dependent code in the
garbage collector except for the bit that allocates memory from the OS.
Could you send us the code?
Cheers,
Simon
I'm compiling the latest version (ie, cvs diff is silent).
---
rm -f PrelNumExtra.o ; if [ ! -d PrelNumExtra ]; then mkdir PrelNumExtra;
else find PrelNumExtra -name '*.o' -print | xargs rm -f __rm_food ; fi ;
../../../ghc/driver/ghc -recomp -cpp -fglasgow-exts -fvia-C -Rghc-timing
-O
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 08:51:29PM +, P.C.Callaghan wrote:
I'm compiling the latest version (ie, cvs diff is silent).
The latter doesn't imply the first, as cvs diff (w/o any further
options) diffs between the version your checkout is based on
and your checkout itself. NOT: between
On 26-Feb-1999, Lennart Augustsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This occurs because in the absense of type declarations,
Haskell assumes that any recursion will be monomorphic,
which is in general not necessarily the case.
As I'm sure you know, type inference is in general impossible
for
On 25-Feb-1999, Lennart Augustsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[someone wrote:]
I've lost track of what we're talking about here. In what system can
we not hope for principal types?
[...] Cayenne doesn't have that property.
Again, I think this is a feature, not a bug. I'll include
a
So what does Cayenne do if you don't declare the type for `push'?
Does it report an error?
The basic principle in Cayenne is that you need type signatures
everywhere. This is sometimes rather verbose and is relaxed
in some cases, but not here. If you omit the type signature
the compiler
