Consider the following two Modules:
File A.lhs:
==
module A where
data A a = MkA a
==
File B.lhs:
==
module B where
import qualified A
type A a = A.A a--- Problem!
==
ghc-4.03 (current sources) complains while
CVS Snapshot Bug?
Please let me know if you need more information.
Fixed today, thanks for the report.
Cheers,
Simon
I've tried `ghc-4.02-i386-unknown-linux.tar.gz' in-place, but even
"hello world" will dump core.
Some info about my box:
glibc-2.1.1
I think the conclusion is that recent glibcs don't work with ghc.
Unfortunately we don't have a box here to test on, so if anyone can help
narrow down the
Anatoli Tubman wrote:
T How can I *efficiently* print (i.e. find the decimal, or in
T general N-ary, representation of) large Integers, like factorial of 1?
Lennart Augustsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied
A Use hbc? It uses the gmp routine to convert an Integer to a String.
A Converting
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:18:31PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
[...]
splitFilterMap unSplitFn afterMap filterPredicate beforeMap splitFn =
unSplitFn . map afterMap . filter filterPredicate . map beforeMap . splitFn
[...]
sorry this looks morre terrible to me than all
Hi
I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are
fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this?
Thanks
Hugo
--
Dr Hugo Bouckaert - Systems Administrator, Computer Science UWA
Tel: +(61 8) 9380 2878 / Fax: +(61 8) 9380 1089
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Web:
In principle I can do this, but:
1. how do I hide the import of show String to replace it w/ my own?
2. If I do replce show String what else will break?
3. If instead I define an eshow function that strips "", how do I minimize
the perforamnce hit of quote stripping?
4. If I want to share
Hello!
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 01:29:12AM -0700, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
[...]
- Would people actually add stuff? I'm a bit skeptical, but it would
be great to have my skepticism proved unfounded.
I think, Friedrich and those who helped him could have posted their
questions and
Hugo Bouckaert wrote:
I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are
fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this?
... and , if you are already here,...
could somebody explain, please, what does it mean to have a compiler
which is *NOT* y2k compliant, what is
S. Alexander Jacobson writes:
In principle I can do this, but:
1. how do I hide the import of show String to replace it w/ my own?
2. If I do replce show String what else will break?
I'd rather let the preprocessor insert calls to eshow, and leave show
as it is.
3. If instead I define
On Wed 09 Jun, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
... and , if you are already here,...
could somebody explain, please, what does it mean to have a compiler
which is *NOT* y2k compliant,
I have found that some compilers put the date and time of compilation in the
resulting object files, so it is
Hi Hugo,
| I would like to know whether haskell compilers (hugs, hbc and lmlc) are
| fuly y2k compliant. Can anyone fill me in on this?
My understanding is that none of the current Haskell implementors
can afford to answer a question like this because none of us have
the developer, support, or
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
[...]
What is difficult is that by using some predefined function, one can
express very much in very small code. I believe Haskell is even more
expressive than most OO languages
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
[...]
What is difficult is that by using some predefined function, one can
express very much in very small code. I believe Haskell is even more
expressive than most OO languages with comparable libraries
14 matches
Mail list logo
