First, thanks to those who responded to my request RE vectors.
I looked at the stuff suggested, very instructional. I realized
however that all I really wanted was to instanciate Num a => Num [a],
so I just did it, in only a few lines. I dont know why I just didnt
do it :)
Second, I have to a
Un regalo para todos ustedes, no hay nada mejor que esto para decorar su escritorio o
protector de pantallas.
Try the Webshots Desktop today and start getting a new
photo every day of the year!
follow this link:
http://cards.webshots.com/ecash.fcgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some suggestions:
Abelson, Sussman and Sussman, _The Structure and Interpretation of
Computer Programs_. http://www-mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/
especially chapter 3 about the costs and benefits of introducing
assignment.
Barendregt's _The Lambda Caclulus_
or his paper: _T
Ronald J. Legere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 2 Nov 1999
> Has anyone out there written up a vector/matrix
> package (i.e. , support for types Num a => [a] ).
> ...
http://haskell.org/docon
contains the program, that among other issues, can, for example,
compute the things like
> Has anyone out there written up a vector/matrix
>package (i.e. , support for types Num a => [a] ).
>Ideally such a package would instance Num, etc, and support
>matrix multiplication, etc etc. I did look on the haskell
>web page, but cannot find anythign like this.
There exists a page by Jan S
Sven,
You've already heard from nhc, hbc, and ghc, so here's the
perspective from Hugs-land to complete your set.
| What is the rationale for the second condition, i.e. why is no
| defaulting done when a user-defined class is involved? Example:
Defaulting is one of those places where Haskell ma
