Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:20:46 +0100, George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> So if you agree with me up to here, perhaps you are agreed that it is worth
> while trying to find a middle way, in which we try to combine both approaches.
I am thinking about a yet different approach. Leave classes an
I think the following program
import List
main = putStr . show . fst . (partition id) . cycle $ [True,False]
should display [True,True,True,...]. But instead, for both GHC and Hugs,
you get a stack overflow. Is this a bug, or could someone explain it to me?
___
Alternatively, I wonder whether the current system of type classes is the right
model at all.
Although I prefer the Haskell system, I think it is instructive to compare it
with the Standard ML (SML) system of structures and functors. My point is that
both Haskell and SML impose one of two possib
