On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Julian Seward (Intl Vendor) wrote:
Wierd. We work with sparc-solaris-2.7 and gcc 2.95.3
and it all works.
gcc2_compiled is a bogus symbol inserted by gcc into all its
generated assembly, for no apparent reason.
Suggestion:
Look in rts/Linker.c in fn ocGetNames_ELF.
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:25:31 +0100 (MET), Josef Svenningsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Linker.c:347: `stg_chk_2' redeclared as different kind of symbol
Use SymX instead of Sym.
--
__( Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^
QRCZAK
I think it's an ill-thought-out exception. The point is this:
if a data constructor cannot appear on its own in a hiding
list, then you can't hide the constructor without hiding the
type. Currently you can say
import Maybe hiding( Just )
It would be simpler and more uniform to only
A good point. You are right that the report is not very explicit
on this point; and right that omitting the qualifier would be in the
spirit of the story for type sigs and instance decls.
I'd be interested to know what others think.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Iavor S.
Folks,
Concerning the recent change about instance declarations, should
this be valid?
module M( C(op1) ) where-- NB: op2 not exported
class C a where
op1 :: a-a
op2 :: a-a
module N where
import M
instance C
Hi!
For whatever that is worth, my semantics agrees with Simon's point here,
ie in the example code
module M( C(op1) ) where-- NB: op2 not exported
class C a where
op1 :: a-a
op2 :: a-a
module N where
import M
I hate to followup to myself, but looks like I had to. I really was
too tired and lazy version could be obtained by simple use of
accumulator:
ADR Are you _sure_ that's all it takes?
Well, I cannot be 100% sure, but what I observe in ghci is that evaluating
'recs - readRecordFile some_name'
