Reto Kramer wrote:
I'm trying to deliver a self contained app that I developed with ghc
5.04.1 on Mac OS X (10.2.2). It all works well if ghc is installed on
the machine, but on a user-machine w/o ghc, the following file is
needed:
HaskellSupport.framework/Versions/A/HaskellSupport
Yes.
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
G'day all.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 01:47:37PM -0600, Artie Gold wrote:
One suggestion, though is that you're working too hard; there's really
no reason to define a locally defined function. The much simpler:
long [] = 0
long (x:xs) = 1 +
G'day all.
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
It has quite different performance characteristics, though. In
particular, this uses O(n) stack space whereas the accumulator one
uses O(1) stack space.
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 12:17:10PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
This is assuming
Hello,
If I understand what you're saying, it seems that an intuitive view of OI
would be :
passing a token allowing to do IO operations.
We pass the token to the main function.
After an operation we give the token to next.
It's unsafe to crete a new token.
From this, I think the safety become
On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 04:00 AM, Jyrinx wrote:
As an experiment for a bigger project, I cooked up a simple program: It
asks for integers interactively, and after each input, it spits out the
running total. The wrinkle is that the function for calculating the
total should be a
