At 10:28 14/01/04 +0100, Daan Leijen wrote:
I'll fix this in the Parsec sources, so the GHC 6.2+ will have it.
Maybe I'll even get around to documenting Parsec with Haddock comments
some day...
If I may say so, I think you did a pretty good job of documenting Parsec...
#g
Graham Kly
I've just been bitten by the ghost of DOS when trying to unpack the source
kit for GHC on a Windows (XP) system. It appears that the filename AUX is
reserved (still crazy after all these years?).
Unfortunately, the GHC source kit contains a file aux.dtd in
.\ghc-6.2\src\libraries\HaXml\bugs
S
Wang Meng writes:
:
| > class Foo n
| > data Erk n = Foo n => Erk
|
| test.hs:53:
| All of the type variables in the constraint `Foo n' are already in
| scope
| (at least one must be universally quantified here)
:
| Is there any reason for this error?
I think it implies that
Hello,
could Haddock be made to document also fixity declarations?
Wolfgang
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Hi All,
Anybody knows why the following code does not work?
> class Foo n
> data Erk n = Foo n => Erk
test.hs:53:
All of the type variables in the constraint `Foo n' are already in
scope
(at least one must be universally quantified here)
When checking the existential context of
Sorry, this was meant to go to the library list.
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2004 10:55 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 22:56 schrieb Ross Paterson:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:36:58PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 19:12 schrieb Ross Pate
Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 22:56 schrieb Ross Paterson:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:36:58PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 19:12 schrieb Ross Paterson:
> > > * made the types abstract, but provided the equivalent constructor and
> > > destructor functions. I'm
What about these?
sourceColumn :: SourcePos -> Column
sourceLine :: SourcePos -> Line
These signatures are missing in the source, therefore they are not listed in the documentation generated by haddock.
I'll fix this in the Parsec sources, so the GHC 6.2+ will have it.
Maybe I'll even get arou
To my recent suggestion on the field label overloading
> > ...
> > data Foo1 = Foo1 {size :: Int ...}
> > data Foo2 = Foo2 {size :: Int ...}
> > ...
> > f x y z = let size = Foo1..size in
> >(size x)+(size y)+(Foo2..size z)
>
Hal Daume III wrote on Jan
