On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:06:25 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time), S.
Alexander Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lemmih,
>
> The current Haskell/Cabal module and packaging system is substantially
> annoying for the typical non-sysadmin end-user. In particular, if
> they move their code to another m
Lemmih,
The current Haskell/Cabal module and packaging system is substantially
annoying for the typical non-sysadmin end-user. In particular, if
they move their code to another machine they have to do a bunch of
different administrivia including:
1. knowing the source package for each module
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:06:25 +0100, Sven Moritz Hallberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Greetings Alexander,
>
> I have been thinking about something very much similar for some time.
> But:
>
> Am 21. Mrz 2005 um 21.47 Uhr schrieb S. Alexander Jacobson:
>
> > As I move from machine to machine, it
A few quick thoughts:
1 Although technically HTTP URLs are locations rather than
identifiers, that is the behavior we want in this context. If you
want to trust someone else to serve you the correct module, you should
specify it. A formal spec should define exactly what URI schemes are
support
Greetings Alexander,
I have been thinking about something very much similar for some time.
But:
Am 21. Mrz 2005 um 21.47 Uhr schrieb S. Alexander Jacobson:
As I move from machine to machine, it would be nice not to have to
install all the libraries I use over and over again. I'd like to be
abl
As I move from machine to machine, it would be nice not to have to
install all the libraries I use over and over again. I'd like to be
able to do something like this:
import http://module.org/someLib as someLib
If the requested module itself does local imports, the implementation
would first
Dear Haskellers,
We are interested in finding out from the Haskell community what sort of monadic
programs people write, and in particular how they arrive at those programs. We
have (Deling and Martin) developed a particular algorithm and tool for automatic
monadification of Haskell programs, an
On 21 Mar 2005, at 12:12, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
Sven Moritz Hallberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1. In addition to the backslash, accept "mathematical * small
lamda" (U+1D6CC, U+1D706, U+1D740, U+1D77A, and U+1D7B4) for lambda
abstractions. Leave "greek small letter lamda" as a r
Sven Moritz Hallberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. In addition to the backslash, accept "mathematical * small
> lamda" (U+1D6CC, U+1D706, U+1D740, U+1D77A, and U+1D7B4) for lambda
> abstractions. Leave "greek small letter lamda" as a regular letter,
> so the Greeks can write their native
Greetings GHC and Haskell folk, please excuse the cross-post.
This is a coordinational message. :)
I've been longing for Unicode (UTF-8) input support in GHC for a long
time. I am currently customizing a keyboard layout to include many
mathematical operators and special characters which would be
10 matches
Mail list logo
