Hello Donald,
Tuesday, April 4, 2006, 9:12:12 AM, you wrote:
> Enjoy reading about the problems of n+k and why Haskell needs a binary IO
> class,
> way back in 1990 :)
it seems that i should participate in the discussion. can you please
add posting facilities? :-E
--
Best regards,
Bulat
dons:
> I managed, with the help of some custom hacks, to convert Simon's
> tarball of the haskell@ archives from 1990-2000 into html.
By the way, this was in the context of writing up the HWN-style news
over that decade, here:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Old_news
-- Don
__
I managed, with the help of some custom hacks, to convert Simon's
tarball of the haskell@ archives from 1990-2000 into html.
I've hosted the lot here:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/haskell-1990-2000/threads.html
I'm not sure these archives are available anywhere else, other than the
tarbal
Joost,
Thanks very much - this solved my problem!
Cheers
Chris.
On 3 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Joost Visser wrote:
Hi Chris,
Changes in the libraries of GHC have broken Strafunski
compatibility in the past. I have not upgraded to GHC 6.5 myself so
I'm not sure if this is the case again. Which
Hi Chris,
Changes in the libraries of GHC have broken Strafunski compatibility
in the past. I have not upgraded to GHC 6.5 myself so I'm not sure if
this is the case again. Which versions of DrIFT and Strafunski are
you using?
Based on what you write, it seems new instances for Typeable h
Hi,
I am trying to use Strafunski with GHC 6.5 and was wondering if
someone could help me. I have all the instances for Term and Typeable
defined for my data types, but when I try to compile with GHC 6.5 I
get lots of "overlapping instance" errors. In particular, it seems
the instances I
