#807: glibc double free error when running program compiled for profiling with
-px RTS option
--+-
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner:
Type: bug| Status:
#807: glibc double free error when running program compiled for profiling with
-px RTS option
--+-
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
#795: ghc-6.5.20060607: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) ... initC: srt
+---
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner:
Type: bug| Status: new
Priority: normal |
#795: ghc-6.5.20060607: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) ... initC: srt
+---
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner:
Type: bug| Status: new
Priority: normal |
On 6/28/06, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:52:51AM +0200, Joel Bjrnson wrote:
Hi. I came a cross the following phenomena which, at least to me,
occurs kind of awkward. The code below:
data MyData a where
DC1 :: (Show a ) = a - MyData a
GADTs don't yet
I'm not sure on which mail of this thread I should append MHO.
What happens if two programmers happen to choose the same package
name? (Prepend the location on the filesystem? ;-)
If something like a package name is introduced I would prefer not
separating package and module name with a .
Marc Weber wrote:
I'm not sure on which mail of this thread I should append MHO.
What happens if two programmers happen to choose the same package
name? (Prepend the location on the filesystem? ;-)
If something like a package name is introduced I would prefer not
separating package and module
A new version of hmp3 has been released, version 1.1
hmp3 is a curses-based mp3 player written in Haskell. It is designed to be
simple, fast and robust.
This is mostly a maintenance, release, fixing support for ghc 6.4.2.
However, you do get some new features:
* Enable searching of the
Hello Jun,
Wednesday, June 28, 2006, 9:58:11 AM, you wrote:
These bindings are already cabalized, you have to type only as follows
to install them:
% runghc ./Setup.hs configure
% runghc ./Setup.hs build
# runghc ./Setup.hs install
i propose to use the Makefile attached in all cabalized
I am pleased to announce a new version of MissingH. Changes since the
last announcement include:
* Fix a bug in ConfigParser.merge and write a test for it.
* Fix cabal incompatibilies with GHC 6.4.2
* IO/StatCompat: Fixed missing Data.Bits import on mingw32
* Updated COPYING file with
** this is literate haskell
hoping someone can help me. What I am trying to do is
class Ba1 a
ba1 :: Ba1 a = a - IO ()
ba1 x = print helllo
what I wish to do is declare another function
class Foo a
proxy :: Foo a = a - IO ()
so that I can do something like
proxy x = ba1 x
this
NB
the essence what I am trying to do is to define a proxy class Foo for class
Ba1 I would have thought that something as simple as the following would
have worked ??
class Ba1 a where
dosomething :: a - IO ()
ba1 :: Ba1 a = a - IO ()
ba1 x = dosomething x
instance Ba1 Int where
John Meacham wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
.. (and jhc already generates native C code, so it will have at least
one substantial advantage over GHC) ...
Compiling via C is a dead end. We realised this about 5 years ago, and
yet we still haven't managed
dkarapet wrote:
I have been trying to understand closures
in haskell and how they relate
to side effects. I have been looking
around but all I find are trivial
examples with no side effects. Please let
me know if you know of any examples.
The side effects occur in the context that causes
old mehopefully (well, i liked the discussions) this message will not spawn
old meso much messages :)
Still everyone will be pleased to know that I won't post any more about this
subject now that the third true silent 'h' has been found :-)
Best regards, Brian.
my apologies ;)
thu
Hi. I came a cross the following phenomena which, at least to me, occurs kind
of awkward. The code below :
data MyData a where
DC1 :: (Show a ) = a - MyData a
instance Show (MyData a) where
show (DC1 a ) = show a
yields the ghci error :
'Could not deduce (Show a) from the context (Show
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:52:51AM +0200, Joel Bjrnson wrote:
Hi. I came a cross the following phenomena which, at least to me,
occurs kind of awkward. The code below:
data MyData a where
DC1 :: (Show a ) = a - MyData a
GADTs don't yet work right with classes. :( The above, however,
On 6/28/06, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:52:51AM +0200, Joel Bjrnson wrote:
Hi. I came a cross the following phenomena which, at least to me,
occurs kind of awkward. The code below:
data MyData a where
DC1 :: (Show a ) = a - MyData a
GADTs don't yet
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Can I urge any of you who learn stuff that I wish I'd know at the
beginning to add that information to GHC's FFI Wiki page?
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/Using_the_FFI
Anyone can add to this material, and it's extremely helpful to jot
down what you've learned while
I'm not sure on which mail of this thread I should append MHO.
What happens if two programmers happen to choose the same package
name? (Prepend the location on the filesystem? ;-)
If something like a package name is introduced I would prefer not
separating package and module name with a .
Ketil Malde wrote:
GHC puts the C library (-lafi) *before* Haskell library
(-lHSfmi-0.0) that refers to it. Redoing the collect2 command but
moving -lafi last does, in fact, work. Also, specifying
extra-libraries in the cabal package works, as long as they are
specified in the correct order.
Marc Weber wrote:
I'm not sure on which mail of this thread I should append MHO.
What happens if two programmers happen to choose the same package
name? (Prepend the location on the filesystem? ;-)
If something like a package name is introduced I would prefer not
separating package and module
Joel Björnson wrote:
Hi. I came a cross the following phenomena which, at least to me, occurs
kind
of awkward. The code below :
data MyData a where
DC1 :: (Show a ) = a - MyData a
instance Show (MyData a) where
show (DC1 a ) = show a
yields the ghci error :
'Could not deduce (Show
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Brian Hulley wrote:
I suppose they are the exception that proves the rule... :-)
Seems like there's a real opportunity here for someone who works in the
area of inference systems for error handling ... .
(Hmmm, pun-potential may not be the best way to pick a
24 matches
Mail list logo
