If you are interesting in helping out as a possible mentor for this
year's Summer of Haskell, please email me, and include MENTOR in the
title.
Thank you!
-Edward
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
I'm no expert on reading GHC's generated assembly. However, there may
be a line you've overlooked in explaining the difference, namely:
movq $stg_upd_frame_info,-16(%rbp)
This appears only in the IO code, according to what you've pasted, and
it appears to be pushing an update frame (I
Hi,
I am pleased to announce that we are now accepting applications for a
postdoctoral research position in programming languages. The position is
for 24 months, starting on or around September 1, 2016. Funding is
provided by a five-year, €1.99M Consolidator Grant from the European
Research
I have a loop which runs millions of times. For some reason I have to run
it in the IO monad. I noticed that when I convert the code from pure to IO
monad the generated assembly code in essence is almost identical except one
difference where it puts a piece of code in a separate block which is
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:03:55 +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel
wrote:
Hello *,
:
| In consultation with the current members of the Haskell Prime
| committee (and Simon PJ), I have volunteered as chair to "reboot" the
| process and get things rolling again.
:
I think it's
On Sun, 01 May 2016 00:22:44 +0200, Austin Seipp
wrote:
:
- It has strong access control mechanisms. This means the Prime
committee can do things like have private discussion, outside of usual
e.g. email. I know people are intimately leery of this, but I think in
Call for Papers
Workshop on
Logic Programming for Type Inference
16-17 October 2016, New York, USA
https://ff32.host.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/lpti16/
Objectives and scope
---
Two facts are universally acknowledged: critical software must be
subject to formal verification and modern
Do you really need that many type signatures? I remember trying to work out
what extra information is needed when type checking case with dependent types.
If memory serves, you can get by with just specifying the single (type)
function that is instantiated in each arm and in the conclusion.
Just to be clear, MonoLocalBinds, as implemented, does not apply to local
bindings that could equally well have been written at top level; that is, they
do not mention any locally-bound variables (except other local bindings that
could themselves be floated).
So you are at liberty to use where