On 1/28/07, Alexy Khrabrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do people stumble on Haskell? I've taught ML at UPenn, and many
For some diversity ...
For years I'd been using (and largely happy with)
pure fortran with a little tcl thrown in for scripting.
I'd played around with a few other
Argh ... gmail totally mangled that patch. (The line that starts
with loadObj(image) needs to be part of the previous line).
I've put an unmangled version online at
http://cass166.ucsd.edu/~david/link-patch
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
I just built ghc from HEAD on OS X (ppc), and get the following error
when starting ghci:
---start
[15:15:[EMAIL PROTECTED] compiler/stage2/ghc-inplace --interactive
___ ___ _
/ _ \ /\ /\/ __(_)
/ /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive, version 6.7, for Haskell 98.
/ /_\\/ __ /
I ran the testsuite against the current HEAD (as of saturday afternoon)
and had far fewer failures. Is the last week's work supposed to have
fixed so many test cases? Or are different machines giving different
results? The tests that resulted in unexpected failures for greg were
all run on my
I managed to build ghc-6.5.20060804 on a powerpc mac, and I spent a
little time Saturday night trying to work out what might be going on
with the threaded RTS.
Running the testsuite with make WAY=threaded1 shows many (73)
failures. Many of them (the conc??? set) have to do with TVars, in
Hi,
I've been using ghc on Mac OS X for a while now, so when I noticed
Simon Marlow's call (made last month, but I just noticed it) for people
to help with OS X, I thought, why not?
Well, it turns out that I can't even build ghc, so I'm not likely to
end up being much help. But it would be
