Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 5.04.2 released

x27;s broken; should it be this? http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/release-5-04.html (Seems like the "html" is missing.) Jyrinx [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: Isn't this tail recursive?

Aha! Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation. I suppose that, in general, for tail recursion to work right, the accumulator has to be evaluated strictly (as is how my code was fixed)? Jyrinx [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 09:34, Hal Daume III wrote: > Here's the basic idea. Su

Re: Isn't this tail recursive?

relatively new to Haskell, and my understanding of laziness is hardly rigorous; in general, how should I know where I need to use seq, and what I need to use it on? Is there a paper I should read? (I've got Hudak's book, but it does everything lazily IIRC) Jyrinx [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Isn't this tail recursive?

optimization I should be aware of (I'm compiling with -O2)? Is this a flaw in GHC? (BTW, as a beginner, I'd be glad to hear general commentary on my code ...) Thanks! Jyrinx jyrinx_list at mindspring dot com ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell