about a
gigabyte by itself plus all the other packages. The mirror will have to
download all the updated packages, plus upload to users updating from
that mirror.
I speculate it will be several gigabytes a month.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-h
Can we have HsQML added to the repo?
Thanks!
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
.
Combining xrev and pkgrel in a singe integer somehow is feasible but
seems hack-ish and probably will need to get changed again in the future.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
it. Sorry..
Maybe it will happen again.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
mentioned it in a previous email. I told packman to install
`haskell-base` because the Setup complained `base` was missing.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
On 23/04/15 16:46, Skottish wrote:
pacman -Q haskell-regex-tdfa
haskell-regex-tdfa 1.2.0-76
But this is me after having a go at installing and reinstalling various
alleged missing dependencies.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch
-0.2.3-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz:
Unrecognized archive format
[...]
Goes on, but errors regarding haskell packages are that it could not
open file. maybe something else had gone wrong.. Still researching.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch
-* packages then unusable? Cause that seemed to be the effect
it had on me.
This is the issue I was trying to discuss here. Can you see what happens
if you reinstall ghc?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http
the _ghc_ package.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
out
old packages rather aggressively, so make sure to update your repo
data (`pacman -Sy`) often.
What are the commands for reinstalling all of ArchHaskell based packages?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http
.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
install them manually, but should I have to?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
/libHSbase-4.8.0.0-I5BErHzyOm07EBNpKBEeUv.a
27632384
/usr/lib/ghc-7.10.1/site-local/texmath-0.8.0.2/libHStexmath-0.8.0.2-1UuTXL14IBUBNFTO6p9bK5_p.a
25808360
/usr/lib/ghc-7.10.1/site-local/highlighting-kate-0.5.14/libHShighlighting-kate-0.5.14-5S9jZ1dVOgcGI7XstIXNsq.a
```
--
SP
files?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
On 13/04/15 18:26, Skottish wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 06:37:25AM -0700, Skottish wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:31:12AM +0100, SP wrote:
If you do clear the cache as Nicola suggested and you still have
problems, please also tell us which mirror you are using.
[...]
Just a side note
it in the packaging standards. We can liaise with the
core team to find out the Arch-y way for this issue.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
will also be following a path of least
surprise for us, in case they decide in the future to work scenarios
like ours differently.
Who knows.. in a future where everything is running on Haskell,
ArchHaskell might need to be merged in their extra repos!
--
SP
If you do clear the cache as Nicola suggested and you still have
problems, please also tell us which mirror you are using.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch
What about ARM?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
-garde.
https://ghcarm.wordpress.com/
I have a person interest in this but not pursued it. Maybe with some
collaboration it would become more expedient. Are you interested?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http
On 17/03/15 12:24, Magnus Therning wrote:
I received a notification about the edit; it looks perfect to me.
Thanks for setting this up!
You are welcome. Thanks for setting up the original repo :)
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch
On 12/03/2015 09:18, Magnus Therning wrote:
If you feel confident enough with it then feel free to add it to the
Wiki page[1].
I need to test it on Tuesday and then I will add it.
--
Stavros
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
Would you like some server space? What access do you need? Or maybe as a
mirror meanwhile?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
What exactly is the unclear problem? Signalling the process of patching,
or how the patching process works?
--
SP
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http
24 matches
Mail list logo
