Having donned my flame-resistant suit, I am going to venture that I think
the differences of opinion in the posts copied below are in large part the
result of people talking about different things at the same time.
First, there is a claim that functional languages facilitate parallel
execution,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Satnam Singh wrote:
I'm trying to find out about existing work on implicit parallel functional
programming. I see that the Glasgow Haskell compiler has a parallel mode
which can be used with PVM and there is interesting work with pH at MIT. Does
anyone know of any
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
Do you have some experience or knowledge about Parallel Haskell? And
Parallel Haskell runs, but there are problems. Unless someone has slipped
something past me, there is no parallel implementation for Release 6 yet,
so if you want to tinker
(A) Give a perfect answer.
(B) Give a subtly flawed answer.
(C) Give an obfuscated answer.
(D) Give a critique of what the questioner has tried so far.
(E) Give relevant general advice without answering the specific question.
As a general rule, I require any student who comes to me for
I have now made several failed attempts to compile various versions of the
fptools package with parallel support (way=mp). The Debian packages I have
tried come in without the _mp libraries, and all of the different
variations I have tried on building from source have failed with nasty
errors
To reduce the amount of duplication, I'm going to assume that everyone
copied on your original note to me reads the list and copy only the list.
If you know someone on the copy list who does not read the list, please
tell me, and I will individually copy them on appropriate future e-mail.
On
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of GpH, I wonder how is GdH coming along? It seems
that the installation instruction on http://www.cee.hw.ac.uk/~dsg/gdh/
is still incomplete...
As far as I know, Mosix has nothing to do with PVM, so am I
right to say that GpH
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
hmake-3.06
--
We are pleased to announce a fresh, bugfix, release of hmake, the
Haskell compilation manager.
www.cs.york.ac.uk seems to be down. Does anyone know of a mirror
Further to my earlier post on the same subject:
The problem seems to be not in my code, but in some sort of nasty
interaction between thread dispatching, the trace function, and
possibly, Gtk: It appears that trace dumps what is expected (indicating
execution of functions that I thought
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Jay Cox wrote:
If checkWid is never invoked, then possibly it is never forced to begin
with, which I think means the bug is elsewhere in your code (or
elsewhere).
Which turns out to be the case, although I haven't pinned it down
completely--please see my follow-up post
Here's the problematic snippet, using GHC 5.00.2:
mapWidList :: [(Int,Int,Bool)] - [WidNode] - Int- [WidNode]
mapWidList showList
widNodes seq
--map (\x - (checkWid showList x (widNodes!!x)))
-- [0 .. ((length widNodes) -1)]
I am using SocketPrim to send a udp packet to each of 254 addresses on a
network. The message packets have been preconstructed and placed in a
list, whose content has already been checked for correctness and appear
to meet the specifications in the appropriate RFC. When I go
through the list
Found the error. No need to follow up.
Apologies to anyone who objects to mail that turns out not to need
answering.
Murray Gross
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
13 matches
Mail list logo
