w.dcs!sinclair
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 23:51:14 +0200
From: Lennart Augustsson
As far as I can tell there is no way to detect EOF with ReadChannels.
Maybe you should ask the designer (Paul Hudak) of this language feature
how to do it.
The endless stream of -1 with hbc is definitely
.)
Do you advocate that?
Paul
allow using the same syntax to support arrays, lists, etc. Some
people I know are working on that...
-Paul
lists.
Of course, if you really don't like the parens, you can always write
your example as:
f $ x!i
where ($) is defined in the prelude as:
infixr 0 $
f $ x = f x
(:-) -Paul
A previous student of mine (Duke Briscoe) forwarded this to me (I've
shortened it somewhat). Thought you all might enjoy it...
-Paul
OCEANPORT, N.J. (UPI) -- Owner Scott Savin has been saying for weeks
that his Technology might be the ``best of the rest'' of 3-yea
decision within
about a 6-week time-frame.
For those not familiar with functional programming research at Yale,
below is a list of faculty and graduate students, along with their
research interests.
Best regards,
-Paul
Professor Paul Hudak
Department Of Computer Science
Programming Languages an
ses now.
Enjoy,
-Paul
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1992 18:25:26 EST
From: john peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Haskell report 1.2 now available
Announcing
==
The Haskell Report
pattern matching. Sometime
back there was some discussion about irrefutable patterns by Paul
Hudak. But, I fear it didn't give egs. where such pattern matching was
needed
My earlier message tried to argue for the merits of "lazy patterns", a
technical term for a kind of pat
e issues, see reference
[8] in the Report.
Having said all this, I won't say definitively that I am a fan of lazy
patterns. But if we were to get rid of them, we would at a minimum
need a different way to expla
ick to change! What do people think? (Especially Paul
|and Joe.) -- P
Sounds right to me. Paul?
Yeah, that would be better. Simon, can you make the change?
Given that, I wonder if the various other functions should use "exit"
as the failure continuation instead of "abort"? (rather minor issue)
-Paul
that the Prelude is presented with this convention in the report. I
volunteer to draft the page.
Paul, as syntax honcho you should rule on this. Cheers, -- P
OK, here's a counter proposal: add a subsection 1.6 (1.5 is on layout)
which describes the suggested convention on literate p
201 - 211 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
