Murray Gross wrote:
I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could provide a summary of the best
times recently posted for Haskell Sudoku solvers so I can compare them
with some experimental code I have.
Since the Sudoku puzzle is incidental to the purpose of my code, I'd just
like to find out whe
Taral wrote:
On 7/9/06, Chris Kuklewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I improved the speed and strength of my solver and it finishes the
36638 puzzles
of http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~gordon/sudoku17 in 3885 seconds. It
can solve
all but 164 without guessing, and averages greater 9 puzzles per
sec
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
> I improved the speed and strength of my solver and it finishes the 36638
> puzzles
> of http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~gordon/sudoku17 in 3885 seconds. It can solve
> all but 164 without guessing, and averages greater 9 puzzles per second on a
> 1.3
Murray Gross wrote:
> I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could provide a summary of the best
> times recently posted for Haskell Sudoku solvers so I can compare them
> with some experimental code I have.
>
> Since the Sudoku puzzle is incidental to the purpose of my code, I'd just
> like to find
I'm not sure if there is a comprehensive timing summay but here are
some different approaches and code you can compile and run on your
machine:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Sudoku
In fact, if you run them all, you can share your numbers with us and
we can add them to the Sudoku page. And of c
I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could provide a summary of the best
times recently posted for Haskell Sudoku solvers so I can compare them
with some experimental code I have.
Since the Sudoku puzzle is incidental to the purpose of my code, I'd just
like to find out whether or not my current
