Re: [Haskell] Haskell 6.4 perfomance

2005-03-29 Thread Alexandre
Guido, thank you for the reply. Actually I subscribed to the mlton maillist, and I read that thread. I am interested in Haskell results, but it seems that nor developers, nor users really care about that... Regards, /Alexandre. On Mar 29, 2005, at 12:07, Guido Kollerie wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2005

Re: [Haskell] Haskell 6.4 perfomance

2005-03-29 Thread Guido Kollerie
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:54:51PM +0300, Alexandre wrote: > As I heard, 6.4 version of the Haskell using C-- backend and make lots > of the resulting code perfomance (programs executed faster). > If so, does any test/comparison with other languages available? Yoy might want to read the "A MLton

Re: [Haskell] Haskell 6.4 perfomance

2005-03-24 Thread Keean Schupke
Think this should really go to glasgow-haskell-users... If this is true - how do I get ghc to use C--, and is it really faster than using gcc as a backend with all the bells & whistles turned on (for a pentium-III) something like "-O3 -mcpu=pentium3 -march=pentium3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer

[Haskell] Haskell 6.4 perfomance

2005-03-24 Thread Alexandre
As I heard, 6.4 version of the Haskell using C-- backend and make lots of the resulting code perfomance (programs executed faster). If so, does any test/comparison with other languages available? Thank you in advance, Regards, /Alexandre. ___ Haskell ma