On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:51 -0500, John Peterson wrote:
The reason that MediaWiki was installed on haskell.org is that people
that know how to install and use MediaWiki (Ashley and others)
volunteered to do all the work.
That's fair.
If we want to move up to Drupal we need someone that is
On 1/9/06, Anders Höckersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sön 2006-01-08 klockan 21:12 -0500 skrev John Peterson:
wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
compatible.
As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
the haskell wiki, and just want
On 1/9/06, John Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As everyone has noticed during the making Haskell more open
discussion, MediaWiki was suggested as a better wiki technology for
haskell.org. Ashley Yakeley has generously installed MediaWiki and we
would like to migrate the main pages of
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 21:12 -0500, John Peterson wrote:
wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
compatible.
As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
the haskell wiki, and just want to steal it for my project, I'm not
allowed to, unless I
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:52 -0500, John Peterson wrote:
This isn't a completely done deal - there is still time to object to
the whole thing or make suggestions. Nothing will be visible to the
outside world until we make the switch later. But I believe this will
result in a much better site
As everyone has noticed during the making Haskell more open
discussion, MediaWiki was suggested as a better wiki technology for
haskell.org. Ashley Yakeley has generously installed MediaWiki and we
would like to migrate the main pages of haskell.org into this wiki.
The migration is not complete -
wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
compatible.
As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
the haskell wiki, and just want to steal it for my project, I'm not
allowed to, unless I also release my code under the GNU FDL?
And another point,
wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
compatible.
As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
the haskell wiki, and just want to steal it for my project, I'm not
allowed to, unless I also release my code under the GNU FDL?
This is something
This is something worth debating. Certainly you can ask the author of
the code for permission to use it but this is an extra burden. Would
be nice to have a special wiki construct to mark content as posessing
an extra license. The whole license debate should take place as
soon as possible
sön 2006-01-08 klockan 21:12 -0500 skrev John Peterson:
wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
compatible.
As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
the haskell wiki, and just want to steal it for my project, I'm not
allowed to, unless I
10 matches
Mail list logo
