Re: [Haskell] Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: HaRe-0.6, now on Hackage

2010-07-07 Thread Chris BROWN
Daniel, Ivan, One comment on your .cabal file: it's usually preferred to write "base = 3 && <5" rather than "base >= 3 && <= 4". In particular if e.g. base-4.2.0.0 doesn't fall in the latter range. I don't know how exactly Cabal interprets these bounds, but it's a possibility since 4.2 > 4.0.

Re: [Haskell] Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: HaRe-0.6, now on Hackage

2010-07-07 Thread Daniel Fischer
On Wednesday 07 July 2010 13:33:19, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote: > Chris BROWN writes: > > Dear Haskellers, > > > > As part of our project on Refactoring Functional Programs > > > > http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/projects/refactor-fp/ > > > > we are pleased to announce the availability of HaRe 0.6

[Haskell] Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: HaRe-0.6, now on Hackage

2010-07-07 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Chris BROWN writes: > Dear Haskellers, > > As part of our project on Refactoring Functional Programs > > http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/projects/refactor-fp/ > > we are pleased to announce the availability of HaRe 0.6 on Hackage. > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/HaRe-0.6 Congratulation