Dupree
| Sent: 12 September 2007 15:37
| To: haskell@haskell.org
| Subject: [Haskell] Re: Numeric programming on toy problems in Haskell
|
| Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
| > The GHC extensions are used, however,
| > because of laziness; i.e. automatic derivation of Enum, Num,
| > Fractional,
Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
The GHC extensions are used, however,
because of laziness; i.e. automatic derivation of Enum, Num,
Fractional, Real and RealFrac. Without the GHC extensions, only Eq and
Ord can be derived automatically. If I'm wrong about this, please let
me know, because I would p
Dear Isaac, all,
> Integral looks reasonable (are those really supposed to be div and
> mod in defining quotRem, not quot and rem? I'm not sure).
Yes, you're right. I changed to quot and rem. Also, the denominator
and numerator functions were a bit needlessly complex.
> There's no(?) excuse for
