On 2004-11-22, Benjamin Franksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 November 2004 09:38, Adrian Hey wrote:
You have yet to
explain how you propose to deal with stdout etc..
I see absolutely no reason why stdxxx must or should be top-level mutable
objects. They can and should be treated
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:10, Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2004-11-22, Benjamin Franksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 November 2004 09:38, Adrian Hey wrote:
You have yet to
explain how you propose to deal with stdout etc..
I see absolutely no reason why stdxxx must or should be
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin
| Franksen
| Sent: 23 November 2004 13:21
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [Haskell] Re: Top Level TWI's again was Re: Re: Parameterized
Show
|
| On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:10, Aaron Denney
On 2004-11-23, Benjamin Franksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:10, Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2004-11-22, Benjamin Franksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 November 2004 09:38, Adrian Hey wrote:
You have yet to
explain how you propose to deal with stdout etc..
