On 10/19/05, Georg Martius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was really annoyed by the fact that for Data.Map and Data.Set are no Read
instances declared, but Show instances are! I believe there should be some
kind of unwritten rule that in the standart lib the Show and Read instances
come pairwise
Georg Martius wrote:
Anyway since there was no response to S. Alexander Jacobson post [1], I
decided to write these instances at least for GHC in the style of the other
instances in GHC.Read.
Who feels responsible for including something into Data.Set and Data.Map
(recently I've proposed a
Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon, clicking on any module does not work, currently
Not Found
The requested URL
/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control.Arrow.html was not found on
this server.
Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Server at www.haskell.org Port 80
Sorry, it works now after I cleared my
Hi folks,
I was really annoyed by the fact that for Data.Map and Data.Set are no Read
instances declared, but Show instances are! I believe there should be some
kind of unwritten rule that in the standart lib the Show and Read instances
come pairwise and are fully compatible.
Anyway since
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Georg Martius wrote:
Hi folks,
I was really annoyed by the fact that for Data.Map and Data.Set are no Read
instances declared, but Show instances are! I believe there should be some
kind of unwritten rule that in the standart lib the Show and Read
mai99dgf:
Hi folks,
I was really annoyed by the fact that for Data.Map and Data.Set are no Read
instances declared, but Show instances are! I believe there should be some
kind of unwritten rule that in the standart lib the Show and Read instances
come pairwise and are fully compatible.
