At Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:40:15 +0200,
Krasimir Angelov wrote:
>
> Hello Guys,
> If there are voluntiers I would like to cooperate in the development.
Hello,
I would be interested in helping with this a bit. Conveniently, I
currently maintain NewBinary :p
My first order of business will be to upd
2005/12/8, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> imho, it's better to start from NewBinary library and add features of
> SerTH to it. i can make TH support. btw, where i can download
> NewBinary version about you talk? there is many different variations.
Thanks. Your help will be appreciable. I a
Hello Krasimir,
Thursday, December 08, 2005, 5:40:15 PM, you wrote:
KA> the stream. What I want is to have a single Binary library that is
KA> fast and that have all these features:
KA> - fast implementation
KA> - optional serialization of cyclic datastructures
KA> - optional support for bit lev
Hello Guys,
I am looking at SerTH. The serialization of cyclic datastructures is
quite useful feature but since I did some performance testing I found
that it is too slow and consumes a lot of memory. It isn't surprising,
since the cycles detection has extra overhead. I have changed the
SerTH sour
Donald, Shae, and Bulat,
It sounds like Binary is the right tool for this job. Thanks for
all of your helpful suggestions.
- Matt
On Dec 7, 2005, at 8:36 AM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Wednesday, December 07, 2005, 5:28:42 AM, you wrote:
MMM>I have some program data t
Hello Matthew,
Wednesday, December 07, 2005, 5:28:42 AM, you wrote:
MMM>I have some program data that I'd like to persist. I could just
there is 3 binary serialization packages for GHC:
1) GhcBinary, which is most widely used (including GHC compiler
itself) and is close to be "standard de-
I usually use the the Binary class, found in NewBinary for this task.
You derive Binary for each type you wish to serialise, which gives you a
get and put function on handles. A stripped down version suitable for
many tasks lives here:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hmp3/Binary.hs
This
Hi all,
I have some program data that I'd like to persist. I could just
use read and show and file I/O to store arrays as files. [1] This
works and it is easy and simple (which I like) but it is also
inefficient and a little cumbersome.
I imagine that this is a very common task, and
