Hi,
Chp 8 of the Haskell Report says:
In this chapter the entire Haskell Prelude is given. It constitutes a
*specification* for the Prelude.
Many of the definitions are written with clarity rather than
efficiency in mind, and it is not required
that the specification be implemented as shown
Laszlo Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chp 8 of the Haskell Report says:
In this chapter the entire Haskell Prelude is given. It constitutes
a *specification* for the Prelude.
My question is how strictly this word specification is to be
interpreted? I can think of a strict and a
