Re: [GHC] #4823: Loop strength reduction for array indexing

#4823: Loop strength reduction for array indexing -+-- Reporter: tibbe |Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal

[GHC] #4823: Loop strength reduction for array indexing

#4823: Loop strength reduction for array indexing -+-- Reporter: tibbe | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal| Component

Re: [GHC] #1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults

#1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults +--- Reporter: simonpj |Owner: igloo Type: feature request | Status: closed Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8

Re: [GHC] #1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults

#1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults +--- Reporter: simonpj |Owner: igloo Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8

Re: [GHC] #1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults

#1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults +--- Reporter: simonpj |Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8

Re: [GHC] #1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults

#1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults +--- Reporter: simonpj |Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: high |Milestone: 6.8

Re: [GHC] #1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults

#1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults -+-- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8

[GHC] #1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults

#1046: Make array indexing immune to seg-faults +--- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone

Re: Array Indexing

! It is the responsibility of the programmer to enforce bounds ! checking when required in non-derived instances of class @Ix@. ! An implementation is not required to check that an index ! lies within the bounds of an array when accessing that array. The above is fine by me, but here is a more

Re: Array Indexing

| ! It is the responsibility of the programmer to enforce bounds | ! checking when required in non-derived instances of class @Ix@. | ! An implementation is not required to check that an index | ! lies within the bounds of an array when accessing that array. | | The above is fine by me, but here

Re: Array Indexing

Currently, the report says nothing about whether an instance of Ix should perform bounds checking, or whether this is done automatically by the implementation. My proposal was to say that it should be in the instance declaration, which gives the user a variety of options as to how to