On 25-Aug-1999, Keith Wansbrough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the Haskell 98 report, patterns have the following grammar:
>
> apat ::= var [ @ apat ]
> | ~ apat
> | ...etc...
>
> Thus the following program should be legal (IMHO):
>
> main = let foo@~(x,y) = (1,2)
>
According to the Haskell 98 report, patterns have the following grammar:
apat ::= var [ @ apat ]
| ~ apat
| ...etc...
Thus the following program should be legal (IMHO):
main = let foo@~(x,y) = (1,2)
in print foo
Instead, both Hugs and GHC report
ERROR "TestAsPat.hs" (li
Presumably @~ is an undefined operator, but haskell tries to resolve the
type of foo before resolving the type of @~.
-Alex-
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Keith Wansbrough wrote:
> According to the Haskell 98 report, patterns have the following grammar:
>
> apat ::= var [ @ apat ]
> | ~ apat
>
