On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Anton Moscal wrote:
IMHO, the closest analog of Haskell among OO languages is Cecil:
Cecil contains closures, object initialization in Cecil is lazy and
objects are immutable by default etc.
And the main: Cecil multimethods in conjunction with the Cecil static type
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Ronald J. Legere wrote:
While perusing the newsgroups, I came across a post (of the same subject
as above, if you want to find it on deja news) by Bertrand Meyer (Eiffel)
suggesting "Haskell (http://www.haskell.org) shouldn't really be a
separate programming language,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Eifskell
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Anton Moscal wrote:
IMHO, the closest analog of Haskell among OO languages is Cecil:
Cecil contains closures, object initialization in Cecil is lazy and
objects are immutable by default etc.
And the main: Cecil
While perusing the newsgroups, I came across a post (of the same subject
as above, if you want to find it on deja news) by Bertrand Meyer (Eiffel)
suggesting "Haskell (http://www.haskell.org) shouldn't really be a
separate programming language, but rather an Eiffel library." and that
someone
Ronald J. Legere writes:
While perusing the newsgroups, I came across a post (of the same subject
as above, if you want to find it on deja news) by Bertrand Meyer (Eiffel)
suggesting "Haskell (http://www.haskell.org) shouldn't really be a
separate programming language, but rather an
On 4 Jul 2000, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT), Ronald J. Legere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pisze:
I think this is driven by the recent addition of closure like
'agents' (http://www.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/language/agent/).
They are poor substitutes of