[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Joost Visser and I, we worked out a few maybe not so obvious functional
> programming patterns such as Success By Failure, Role Play, Rewrite Step,
> Keyhole Operation just to mention a few. By not so obvious I mean that
> they deal with generic programming rather than f
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:13:22PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yet another problem is that design patterns are all about design
> and less about coding. Many challenges in functional programming are about
> coding, and just about coding.
This is something I've chatted about with a colleague
G'day all.
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:13:22PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, FP is older than OOP. So why are we so late :-) ?
I know you meant it as an offhand remark, but I think there are two
serious reasons why.
The first one is that OOP and GUIs happened at around the same time
an
--- Joe English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> ... there are plenty of FP design patterns
> in common use, it's just that FP'ers don't usually use the term
> "design patterns" to describe them. I'm thinking of things
> like catamorphisms, anamorphisms (aka folds/unfolds), monads
> and functors, "th
Ralf Laemmel wrote:
>
> Joost Visser and I, we worked out a few maybe not so obvious functional
> programming pattern [...]
> http://www.cs.vu.nl/Strafunski/dp-sf/
Neat!
> I have the feeling that the FP community has a hard time getting started
> with design patterns.
I believe quite the
Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> On the other hand, it's an exciting time to do engineering in
> declarative languages, because we can invent the design patterns and
> discover what the good habits are as we go along.
BTW, FP is older than OOP. So why are we so late :-) ?
Joost Visser and I, we worked
