| So will the features of Hugs eventually be supported by all
| platforms and integrated into a future version of Haskell or will I have
to
| keep seperate versions of my code?
No one is going to guarantee that. However, the GHC team and the
Hugs team are making a conscious effort to align our
Jan de Wit wrote:
> I'm under the impression that Hugs has the most features (probably because
> it's relatively easy to hack on, being an interpreter in C), GHC comes next
> after that and tends to adopt features introduced in Hugs, and NHC and HBC
> lag far behind that (no compiler wars please
Hi All,
Currently there are three and a half major Haskell 98 platforms: the
GHC/Hugs combo, NHC98 and HBC. All of these have some extensions to the
official language, as well as extra libraries. Every platform has
existential type quantification, GHC/Hugs has multi-parameter type classes,
univer
I really don't care what you call it, but please don't call it Haskell 2000
unless you want it to be remembered as just another one of the countless
products and projects that decided to capitalize on the turning of the
millenium under the pretense of commemorating it.
--
Frank
