"S. Alexander Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> In my prior post I identified three problems with using Haskell at the
> server:
> 1. Need for non Unix server support
> 2. Lack of libaries
> 3. The lack of a mod_haskell or jserv like interface for Haskell
>
> In response to (1), Sarah Thomp
In my prior post I identified three problems with using Haskell at the
server:
1. Need for non Unix server support
2. Lack of libaries
3. The lack of a mod_haskell or jserv like interface for Haskell
In response to (1), Sarah Thompson emphasized her satisfaction with NT's
stability. Regarding st
>Right now we are use Haskell to pregenerate HTML/Javascript on Shop.com
>We would love to use it for dynamic page generation, it does not
>appear to meet our needs:
>
>* NT is not a reliable server platform so we can't use HaskellCOM
Many people would tend to disagree with your assertion that N
On Sat, 1 May 1999, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> The third problem is also an implementation issue
> You don't want to have to start a hugs process that makes a
> connection to a database everytime a user makes a request. You want
> something like mod_perl or jserv which keeps the interp
Right now we are use Haskell to pregenerate HTML/Javascript on Shop.com
We would love to use it for dynamic page generation, it does not
appear to meet our needs:
* NT is not a reliable server platform so we can't use HaskellCOM
* Haskell itself has no libs for database,network,files,ldap
* Haske
Hi Sarah,
> 3.What is the best way to interface an existing API to Haskell, given
> that the API has a Win32 DLL style interface? Is it better to reimplement
> the interface as a COM interface, or figure out the necessary IDL code that
> would allow it to link directly?
You can directly inte
Hi Sarah,
I'd like to respond to your questions about licensing etc., at least
as far as Hugs is concerned. Our goal is to make our tools as widely
useful as possible, and with that in mind, we have been considering
matters of licensing very carefully. The most recent versions of
Hugs(*) are di
