tis 2002-08-13 klockan 11.57 skrev Simon Marlow:
Can't we make a mailing list for these issues?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my proposal, who can create
such a list?
I'll set up the list. Anyone wish to volunteer to moderate it?
Does it have to be moderated? This will make
Can't we make a mailing list for these issues?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my proposal, who can create such a list?
I'll set up the list. Anyone wish to volunteer to moderate it?
Simon
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tis 2002-08-13 klockan 11.57 skrev Simon Marlow:
Can't we make a mailing list for these issues?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my proposal, who can create such a list?
I'll set up the list. Anyone wish to volunteer to moderate it?
Does it have to be moderated? This will make things progress
tis 2002-08-13 klockan 11.57 skrev Simon Marlow:
Can't we make a mailing list for these issues?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my proposal, who can create
such a list?
I'll set up the list. Anyone wish to volunteer to moderate it?
Does it have to be moderated? This will make things
fre 2002-08-09 klockan 21.46 skrev Alastair Reid:
Can we stop the pedantry and have some people go off in a corner and
produce a design which [...]
I think this has gone on long enough on the Haskell mailing list, and if
I wasn't interested I would probably have dropped of long ago.
Looking
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:24:55 +0200, George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
but the fact is that the standard access functions return
characters*, and on Solaris the default representation of
a characters is as a signed quantity.
Only because of a messy history. No need to transfer the silly
George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ketil wrote (quoting Ken)
On most machines, Char will be a wrapper around Word8. (This
contradicts the present language standard.)
Can you point out any machine where this is not the case? One with a
Haskell implementation, or likely to have one
Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ketil wrote (quoting Ken)
On most machines, Char will be a wrapper around Word8. (This
contradicts the present language standard.)
Can you point out any machine where this is not the case? One with a
Haskell
George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does the file system know the difference? I think you mean that
C chars on Solaris are signed, not that files and sockets don't
contain octets.
Well, you can define the files to contain only directed graphs if it makes
you feel any happier,
Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
[snip]
and on Solaris the default representation of a characters is as a
signed quantity.
Why should we care?
[snip]
If you want to talk to any C libraries or C programs which use characters, which some
of us do. GNU readline and regex come to mind.
George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
[snip]
and on Solaris the default representation of a characters is as a
signed quantity.
Why should we care?
If you want to talk to any C libraries or C programs which use
characters, which some of us do. GNU readline
Ketil Z Malde wrote:
George Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
[snip]
and on Solaris the default representation of a characters is as a
signed quantity.
Why should we care?
If you want to talk to any C libraries or C programs which use
characters,
Can we stop the pedantry and have some people go off in a corner and
produce a design which:
1) Solves some of the internationalization issues notably those
involving unicode and locales.
2) Will work on a decent range of existing and plausible future
Windows and Unix boxes. (Embedded
13 matches
Mail list logo
