David,

Are the compilers you mention below available for downloading and
experimenting? There are many questions I have about your compiler; I will
formulate them early next week.

>Over the last year, I have developed not one, but two compilers from 
>Haskell to Java Virtual Machine code. Both are based on the Chalmers 
>HBC compiler. 
>
>My first compiler goes via the conventional G-machine. Using SUN's latest
>just-in-time Java 1.1.3 implementation, it goes about half the speed of
>the Nottingham Hugs interpreter for small programs, and about 1/8th of
>the speed for some of the large programs in the "nofib" suite.
>
>My second compiler goes via a version of the nu-G-machine. This is not
>the obvious thing to do, but it works out more cleanly. At the moment,
>its performance is approximately comperable to that of the first 
>compiler, with the exception of the "infer" program from the "nofib"
>suite where it is much worse.
>
>I shall give a talk describing the first compiler, and mentioning the 
>second at the
>
>  9th International Workshop on the Implementation of Functional Languages 
>
>at St. Andrews in early September.
>
>Ciao,
>
>David
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Dr David Wakeling, Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter,
>Exeter EX4 4PT, United Kingdom. http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~david
>You have to be careful what you say around here, or the system administrators
>


David Wilczynski                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pacific Software Solutions      (310)372-0333
1911A Ernest Ave.               fax (310)372-2103
Redondo Beach, CA 90278


Reply via email to