Frustrating.
Its been 4 years since I seriously looked at
Haskell. I would have expected that over this
time, someone here would have consolidated it into
a language useful for real world applications.
The Haskell in Practice page is shockingly short
and many of the examples are not actually Ha
S Alexander Jacobson writes:
> 1. Is there ssl support for the haskell httpd somewhere?
Not that I'd know.
> 2. Does this httpd actually build w/ modern GHC?
It probably will, but not out-of-the-box. The code hasn't
been actively maintained for a while.
> More complex question: [...]
HWS
Thank you for the discussion, but let me ask some
more questions:
Simple questions:
1. Is there ssl support for the haskell httpd somewhere?
2. Does this httpd actually build w/ modern GHC?
3. Why doesn't haskell.org run this httpd?
More complex question:
Assumptions:
* This httpd can do >1000
Thank you for the discussion, but let me ask some more questions:
Simple questions:
1. Is there ssl support for the haskell httpd somewhere?
2. Does this httpd actually build w/ modern GHC?
3. Why doesn't haskell.org run this httpd?
More complex question:
Assumptions:
* This httpd can do >1000
G'day all.
Quoting Paul Graunke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Right, cooperative multitasking is faster than preemptive multitasking.
That's often the case, but it depends. Some OSes have very, very fast
thread primitives. It also depends on the application, as I noted,
because what you lose in syste
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 08:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting Peter Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At least in my experience, multiplexing servers _are_
significantly faster than those relying on the OS (or
whatever library) to do the scheduling. They also tend to be
much
G'day all.
Quoting Peter Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At least in my experience, multiplexing servers _are_
> significantly faster than those relying on the OS (or
> whatever library) to do the scheduling. They also tend to be
> much more efficient in terms of memory consumption, thus
> allowing
Paul Graunke writes:
> [...] event driven servers (which are supposedly oh so
> much faster.)
At least in my experience, multiplexing servers _are_
significantly faster than those relying on the OS (or
whatever library) to do the scheduling. They also tend to be
much more efficient in terms of
Brian Demsky's master's thesis compares servers written in direct style
(using a thread per connection) to event driven servers (which are
supposedly
oh so much faster.) He shows how you can CPS the thread
per connection server and end up with the event driven server.
That way you don't need to m
If anyone ports this to work with GHC6.0 please let us know.
Tom
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:58 am, Peter Simons wrote:
> S Alexander Jacobson writes:
> > Is there a reasonably efficient Haskell httpd
> > implementation around that uses poll/select?
>
> There is a web server written in Haskell: HWS-W
S Alexander Jacobson writes:
> Is there a reasonably efficient Haskell httpd
> implementation around that uses poll/select?
There is a web server written in Haskell: HWS-WP
-- or "Haskell Web Server with Plug-ins". You'll
find it at:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=253134
11 matches
Mail list logo
