Zooko Journeyman, you wrote:
>
> Anyway... All this came out because I saw someone saying "We
> need to add all these features in order to make Haskell useful
> for serious programming!". That may well be true, depending on
> what the features actually are, but it strikes me as ironic
> since
Someone wrote:
> Honestly, would you use a language which does not allow to program a
> depth-first graph traversal in O(n).
Ah. I didn't realize it was that bad. My understanding of
Haskell is quite rudimentary.
And yet, now that I think about it, I have never implemented a
depth-first gr
