Re: type synonyms and monads

2000-05-12 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Fri, 12 May 2000 11:47:11 -0600 (MDT), Thomas Harke [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: Why is it that type synonyms can't be made class instances? It does not add any functionality (see below), and could be confusing because it would really make the instance for the expansion of the type synonym (with

Re: type synonyms and monads

2000-05-12 Thread Thomas Harke
Thanks Marcin, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: Thomas Harke [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: Why is it that type synonyms can't be made class instances? It does not add any functionality (see below), and could be confusing because it would really make the instance for the expansion of the

Re: type synonyms and monads

2000-05-12 Thread Sven Panne
Thomas Harke wrote: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: [...] GHC developers decided that it is more convenient than confusing and permitted to spell type synonyms in instance definitions. I agree with it. Now I'm confused. Do you mean I *can* do this in GHC? But the Haskell Report