At 16:00 +0400 98/08/03, S.D.Mechveliani wrote:
>Not only Complex but the Real numbers too are impossible to be presented
>adequately algorithmically.
Strictly speaking, the "real numbers" should be called floating numbers,
which one usually does in computer contexts if being more accurate.
Jan Skibinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2 Aug 1998
(Subject: Rambling on numbers in Haskell)
> ... I realized that there are several quite annoying problems with
> Haskell numerical types and classes.
> ...
> Yet again - as it has happened with other languages, someone
> has decided t
>
> Not only Complex but the Real numbers too are impossible to be presented
> adequately algorithmically.
> In this sense, they differ from Rational greatly.
> Therefore, i propose for Haskell to name RealLike what it might call
> Real, and ComplexLike - what it might call Complex.
>
> On the
