I right now re-building [ghc74] for both x86_64 and i686. Once that
is done I will basically replace [haskell] with the result of that.
At the moment [ghc74] isn't even close to being a superset of
[haskell]. This is deliberate on my part. In choosing between
putting up a usable repo as soon
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:16, Alessandro Pezzoni
alessandro_pezz...@lavabit.com wrote:
I noticed that the current ghc from [ghc74], i.e. 7.4.1-4, isn't
providing the same packages ghc from [extra] provides (or, at least,
it doesn't turn up if I search for those packages). Is this done on
Magnus Therning wrote:
Nope, [ghc74] is gone, it was absorbed into [haskell].
I'm in the process of adding pandoc, and I'll push in hslua too then.
Great, thanks!
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
Simon Marlow wrote (on 28-05-01 10:17 +0100):
It's not propaganda. The fact is if any of the standard libraries use
the LGPL, then some people will be prevented from using them. That's
the last thing we want, right? Now you might argue from a moral
standpoint that the companies that these
