Re: Tutorial for literate Haskell

2003-03-04 Thread Steffen Mazanek
Hi, > When I ran into the same question some time ago I tried that, > but found that the \verbatim was interpreted to0 literally, so > that the \end{code} does not terminate it. Could you give a > complete short example that works for you? > > My own solution was to copy the definition of verbat

Re: Tutorial for literate Haskell

2003-03-03 Thread b . i . mills
Hi, Since I sent this to the haskell list in the first place, I'd better let everyone know that it all worked out. > Hmm, there were no problems in simply doing so. Ok, I've cut your example down a bit (just from a minimalist tendency). The complete modified code is ... \documentclass{report

Re: Tutorial for literate Haskell

2003-03-03 Thread b . i . mills
Yo, Steffen Mazanek wrote: > I do Literate Programming this way: > At first I define a Latex environment "code" as "verbatim" > e.g. so: \newenvironment{code}{\footnotesize\verbatim}{\endverbatim\normalsize} When I ran into the same question some time ago I tried that, but found that the \verbat

Re: Tutorial for literate Haskell

2003-03-03 Thread Steffen Mazanek
Hello. I do Literate Programming this way: At first I define a Latex environment "code" as "verbatim" e.g. so: \newenvironment{code}{\footnotesize\verbatim}{\endverbatim\normalsize} This environment is understood by the Haskell compilers. All my modules are own documents concluded in the main tex-

Tutorial for literate Haskell

2003-03-03 Thread Daniel Luna
I am planning to write a small project in Haskell and stumbled upon some text that mentioned literate Haskell. Is there any good tutorial on how to write literate Haskell? I know that I could take any tutorial on latex and use that, but that's not what I am after. What I want is more like a base d